An overview of the Three P's of Project Management

An overview of the Three P's of Project Management

Project management requires effective people management. To get a team to cooperate in harmony and work toward a project's goals.

People managers oversee projects. We've all heard this before, but is that all there is to it? Are we merely personnel administrators? I accept that managing people is part of our duties as project managers. I suggest that we pause for a moment to consider a few details. The PMI (Project Management Institute) offers a recognized certification that is recognized by, which is obtained by many PMs. The possibility of earning a Masters in Project Management exists as well.

Are project managers merely people managers in light of this? Is it really believed that all project managers do is manage people? Is a PM's responsibility for managing people their most crucial task?

The three Ps of project management are what I want to discuss in this essay. The components and organisation of project management must be considered while applying the three Ps. The majority of us are aware that there are nine knowledge domains and project management process groups. I can guarantee you there is more to processes group and knowledge areas than just people management.

On the other hand, projects cannot be completed without people or without people management. Therefore, effective people management is crucial, but would a projects be successful with neither two P's? Let me first outline the three Ps of project management before conducting a review.

1) The management of people

2) Management of processes

3) Management of performance

Project management requires effective people management. To get a team to cooperate in harmony and work toward a project's goals, the project manager must exercise strong leadership. In my opinion, collaboration and cooperation are two essential elements of effective people management. A project may be in peril if the organization or a team member does not cooperate and/or work together.

How can you create a team that encourages cooperation and collaboration? I've discovered that a team, not a single person, makes the best decisions. I gather the team as soon on in a program to talk about the goals of the project. The best conclusions should then be reached after involving IT resources and subject matter experts in a debate. I enquire and exhort the group to do so as well. The process of choosing comes up next. I then inquire if there is indeed a better approach and explore for solutions or alternatives.

This article's material encourages readers to make fresh, better selections. Make the team work together and cooperate so that fresh decisions can be made based on new facts. People will participate and the benefits consumers will be given.

Any team that wants to advance typically goes through phases like forming, norming, storming, and conforming. This is something that the PM anticipates and is ready to manage so that the team performs. When employed skillfully, persuasive assertiveness is what drives a team to work through disagreements and pursue project success.

We have just talked about people management up to this point, however teams can be set up for a variety of reasons, and thus the team manager can use the knowledge above to their advantage. Is project management also known as people management?

Both process management and people management are critical. The likelihood of delivering a successful outcome of the project is significantly lowered in the absence of either of these. The PM employs reliable, repeatable procedures that result in a successful project execution in order to enhance project outcomes. PMs include the project implementation groups and knowledge domains using their expertise, effectiveness, and knowledge. Project pandemonium will result if teams, knowledge domains, and groups are not successfully controlled through the project management process. What elements of managing projects are not being successfully entailed in your project if it is in disorder or absolute chaos? Need you look very far?

Without the need for a project management method, I believe that projects will veer off in all directions like just a message in a bottle with no clear destination in sight. The sufferings of projects without a process have been suffered by me. They had trouble with implementation projects, cost overruns, and a constantly shifting project scope. Failure was the final result.

I discovered that when a similar team handled the following application version with just a project management program in place, the outcomes were excellent. A strong scope document contained the details required for user acceptability testing. Five modification requests were submitted; four of them were approved after going through to the change control process. Not only was the plan's goal date met, but the job was also finished earlier than expected. Due to financial savings brought about by being ahead of schedule, the project was finished on time. All of it was completed without any product flaws.

Could people talents have done this on their own? Without a task management procedure, could you achieve project symmetry? I believe you are already aware of the responses to these queries.

Performance Management comes last. For all intensive purposes, this category mostly belongs to process management. I enjoy breaking down performance management and considering it from a fresh angle. One goal of management is to provide an answer to this query. How is the progress on your project? When the question is posed, it ought to be possible to handle the triple limitations. Is the project finishing on time? Is it affordable? Does it fit the project's parameters? A PM can monitor the real development of a project by monitoring the three limitations and can then make changes in response to this data. Performance management keeps the leadership team informed and holds the team accountable.

Consider the prior queries for a moment. Are project managers merely people managers in disguise? Is a PM's responsibility for managing people their most crucial task? Project managers need to strike a balance between people and process management, in my opinion. The best result won't be achieved if one is done without the other.